Building Production Backends with NestJS
Explore how feature-oriented modules and clear dependency boundaries help make NestJS backends easier to maintain as they grow.
My focus for this month of October will be on NestJS framework and how it has imparted my development experience as a fullstack software engineer. NestJS provides a structured framework for building Node.js applications, but the framework alone does not determine whether an application will be maintainable in production.
The architecture surrounding the framework matters a lot. I will be sharing overview on my opinions when developing a secure and scalable systems in NestJS.
Feature-oriented modules
I prefer organizing backend systems around business capabilities rather than technical file types.
For example:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
src/
├── modules/
│ ├── users/
│ ├── authentication/
│ ├── payments/
│ └── notifications/
│
├── infrastructure/
├── shared/
└── main.ts
This keeps related business functionality together.
Dependency boundaries
Business logic should not directly depend on infrastructure details.
For example, application code should depend on an abstraction:
1
2
3
export interface EmailSender {
send(message: EmailMessage): Promise<void>;
}
rather than directly depending on a specific provider.
The infrastructure layer can then implement it:
1
2
3
4
5
export class ResendEmailSender implements EmailSender {
async send(message: EmailMessage): Promise<void> {
// provider implementation
}
}
This makes it possible to replace infrastructure without rewriting business logic.
The goal
The goal is not to create the largest possible architecture.
The goal is to create a system where important decisions remain easy to change.
That principle becomes increasingly important as an application grows.